Your Company Withholds 22% on RSUs. Your Real Rate Is Probably 32%.

RSUs are taxed as ordinary income the day they vest, but your employer withholds at a flat supplemental rate that has nothing to do with your actual bracket. That gap is why so many people in tech get an April bill they did not budget for. There is a second, worse error hiding on the 1099-B.

Tech Talk News Editorial10 min read
ShareXLinkedInRedditEmail
Your Company Withholds 22% on RSUs. Your Real Rate Is Probably 32%.

Key takeaways

  • RSUs are taxed as ordinary income on the fair market value of the shares on the day they vest, whether or not you sell, so the tax is owed on money you may never have chosen to receive as stock.
  • Employers must withhold on RSUs at the flat federal supplemental rate, which is 22% on cumulative supplemental wages up to $1 million and 37% above that, rather than at your actual marginal rate.
  • For 2026 the 24% federal bracket begins around $106,250 for single filers and $211,400 for married filing jointly, so anyone above those figures is under-withheld at 22% and owes the difference in April.
  • A single vest can straddle the $1 million cumulative supplemental threshold, with part withheld at 22% and the remainder at 37%.
  • Brokerages routinely report a $0 cost basis on Form 1099-B for RSU shares, and accepting that figure means paying tax twice on income already reported on your W-2. The fix is a Form 8949 adjustment using code B, with the basis set to the vest-date fair market value.
  • A Section 83(b) election is not available for RSUs, because an RSU is a contractual promise to deliver shares rather than a transfer of property.

Here is the arithmetic that catches people. Your RSUs vest. Say $200,000 worth. Your company withholds 22% for federal tax, sells enough shares to cover it, and hands you the rest. The paperwork looks handled.

Except that $200,000 lands on top of your salary, and your actual marginal rate is probably 32% or 35%. The 22% was never a calculation of what you owe. It is a flat rate the IRS tells employers to apply to supplemental wages, and it has nothing to do with your bracket.[1]The difference is yours to settle in April, and on a vest that size it is tens of thousands of dollars.

That is the well-known problem. There is a second one, buried in your brokerage's tax forms, that makes people pay tax twice on the same shares. That one is worse, because nobody tells you about it at all.

22%
Flat federal withholding, supplemental wages to $1M
37%
Rate above $1M cumulative supplemental
~$106,250
2026 income where the 24% bracket starts (single)
10-15 pts
Typical gap between withheld and owed

What Actually Happens at Vest

An RSU is a promise. Nothing is taxable at grant. On the vesting date the shares are delivered, and the fair market value of those shares that day becomes ordinary income. It goes into your W-2 wages alongside your salary.

Two consequences follow, and both surprise people.

You owe the tax whether or not you sell. The taxable event is the vest, not the sale. If the stock falls 40% between vesting in November and the filing deadline in April, you still owe tax on the November value. This is the mechanism that hurt a lot of people in 2000 and 2022, and it will do it again.

Your vest-date value becomes your cost basis. Everything after that is a capital gain or loss measured from there. Sell immediately and the gain is roughly zero, which is why same-day sale is the simplest choice and not a tax-motivated one. Hold twelve months past vest and further appreciation qualifies for long-term capital gains rates, which is a meaningfully different tax on that second leg.

Plain English

Supplemental wages are payments outside your regular salary: bonuses, commissions, severance, and RSU vests. The IRS lets employers withhold on them at one flat percentage instead of running them through your normal payroll calculation. Convenient for payroll. Nothing to do with what you owe.

The Withholding Gap

Federal supplemental withholding is 22% on cumulative supplemental wages up to $1 million in a year, and 37% on anything above that.[1] For 2026 the 24% bracket begins around $106,250 for a single filer and $211,400 for married filing jointly.[1]

So the moment your total income clears roughly six figures, 22% is too little. Not by a rounding error. If you are in the 35% bracket, every dollar of RSU income is under-withheld by 13 cents, and nothing in your pay stub flags it.

The 22% is not an estimate of your tax that came out slightly low. It is a number chosen for payroll convenience that was never trying to be right.

The $1 million line has a sharp edge worth knowing about. It is cumulative across all supplemental wages for the year, so a bonus in March counts toward it. And a single vest can straddle it, with part withheld at 22% and the remainder at 37%.[1] People who cross that line mid-year often see wildly different withholding on two vests of identical size and assume payroll made a mistake. It did not.

The $0 Cost Basis Trap

This is the one that costs real money, and it is an error rather than a shortfall.

When you sell RSU shares, your broker issues a Form 1099-B. For RSUs it very often reports a cost basis of $0.[2]That is not fraud and not exactly a mistake on the broker's part: brokers are required to report what you paid for the shares, which for RSUs is nothing, and they generally have no visibility into what your employer already reported as wages on your W-2.[2]

But if you or your software accept that $0, the entire sale proceeds get taxed as capital gain, on top of the vest-date value that was already taxed as ordinary income. You pay twice on the same money.

Sell $200,000 of just-vested stock with a reported basis of $0 and you have declared a $200,000 capital gain on shares whose real gain was approximately nothing.

Receipt

The fix: report the sale on Form 8949 and correct the basis to the fair market value on the vest date, which is the figure already in your W-2 income. Where the broker reported an incorrect basis to the IRS, the adjustment is code B.[2] Keep the vest confirmations and the pay stubs that show the income, because the number you are substituting needs to be documented if anyone asks.

Some brokers now supply a supplemental statement with the corrected basis alongside the 1099-B. If yours does, use it. If it does not, the number you need is on your own vest paperwork, and it is worth ten minutes.

No, You Cannot 83(b) an RSU

This comes up constantly and the answer is no. A Section 83(b) election lets you pay tax at grant on property transferred subject to vesting, which is powerful for early-stage equity when the value is near zero. It requires an actual transfer of property.

An RSU is not property. It is an unfunded contractual promise to deliver shares later, so there is nothing to elect on. The instrument 83(b) was written for is a restricted stock award, real shares issued now and subject to forfeiture. The names are close enough that people conflate them and occasionally file an election that does nothing. If your grant documents say “Units,” the election is not available to you.

What To Actually Do

Work out the gap once a year, not in April. Estimate total income, find your marginal rate, subtract 22%, multiply by the RSU income you expect. That is roughly what you will owe beyond withholding. Knowing it in October is a very different experience from discovering it at filing.

Close the gap deliberately. Most payroll systems let you add extra federal withholding to your regular salary, which is the cleanest fix because withholding is treated as paid evenly through the year. Quarterly estimated payments also work. Doing nothing works too, right up until the underpayment penalty.

Decide about the shares separately from the tax. The question of whether to hold vested stock is not a tax question, it is a concentration question. Your salary, your health insurance and your equity are already pointing at the same company. A useful test: if your employer handed you the cash instead, would you buy this much of their stock with it? Most people say no, and then hold anyway.

Do not let the tax tail wag the dog. Holding a concentrated position for twelve months to convert a gain to long-term rates can be right, and it can also mean risking 30% of the position to save 15% on the gain. Run the actual numbers rather than the instinct.

Heads up

This is how the mechanics work, not advice about your situation. State tax adds another layer that varies enormously, and California in particular has its own supplemental rate and treats equity income for people who moved states in a way worth getting proper help on. If your vests are large, a CPA who sees equity compensation regularly pays for themselves in one filing.

Takeaway

RSUs are taxed at vest, as ordinary income, on the value that day, whether or not you sell. Your employer withholds a flat 22%, which is not an estimate of your tax and is too low for almost anyone receiving meaningful equity. Budget the gap in advance. And check the cost basis on your 1099-B, because a $0 there means you are about to pay tax a second time on income your W-2 already reported.

Once the tax is handled, the rest is ordinary portfolio construction: where the proceeds go is the same question as any other cash, and the default answers are in index funds, dollar-cost averaging versus lump sum, and the accounts worth filling first, including the HSA and the employer match you may already be leaving on the table.

Sources and further reading

Withholding mechanics and bracket thresholds are current for the 2026 tax year. Verify against the IRS before filing, because these figures move annually.

  1. 1.ReportingRSU Tax Guide 2026: how restricted stock units are taxed and the withholding gap. Source for the 22% and 37% supplemental rates, the $1M cumulative threshold and straddling vests, and the 2026 bracket thresholds.
  2. 2.ReportingRSU cost basis and Form 1099-B, and how the $0 basis causes double taxation. Source for why brokers report $0 basis and the Form 8949 code B adjustment that corrects it.
  3. 3.PrimaryIRS Topic no. 427, Stock options and restricted stock. The IRS overview of how equity compensation is taxed, including the treatment of restricted stock and the 83(b) election.

Frequently asked questions

How are RSUs taxed?
RSUs are taxed as ordinary income on the fair market value of the shares on the vesting date, and that amount appears in your W-2 wages. Any change in the share price after vesting is a separate capital gain or loss when you eventually sell, measured from that vest-date value.
Why do I owe taxes on RSUs in April if my employer already withheld?
Because employers withhold on RSUs at a flat federal supplemental rate of 22%, not at your marginal rate, and for most people receiving meaningful equity the marginal rate is higher. If your income puts you in the 24%, 32%, 35% or 37% bracket, the shortfall between that and the 22% already withheld is what you owe when you file.
What is the 22% RSU withholding rate?
It is the IRS flat supplemental wage withholding rate, which applies to bonuses, commissions and RSU vests up to $1 million of cumulative supplemental wages in a year. Above $1 million the rate on the excess jumps to 37%, and a single vest can straddle that line, with part withheld at 22% and part at 37%.
Why does my 1099-B show a $0 cost basis for RSUs?
Because brokers are only required to report what you actually paid for the shares, which for RSUs is nothing, and they generally do not know what your employer already reported as wages on your W-2. Accepting the $0 figure means the whole sale proceeds get taxed as gain even though the vest-date value was already taxed as income, so you pay twice on the same money.
How do I fix the RSU cost basis on my tax return?
Report the sale on Form 8949 and adjust the basis to the fair market value on the vest date, which is the amount already included in your W-2 income. When the broker reported an incorrect basis to the IRS, use adjustment code B, and keep your vest confirmations and pay stubs as documentation of the figure you used.
Can I make an 83(b) election on RSUs?
No, because a Section 83(b) election applies to a transfer of property, and an RSU is an unfunded contractual promise to deliver shares later rather than a transfer of shares now. Restricted stock awards, which are actual shares issued subject to vesting, are the instrument 83(b) was written for, and the two are often confused because the names are similar.

Written by

Tech Talk News Editorial

Computer engineering background. Writes about software, AI, markets, and real estate, and the places where the three meet.

More about the author
ShareXLinkedInRedditEmail